THE FRONT PAGE NEWSPAPERS | SAŠA MILIVOJEV: WIKIPEDIA IS A NETWORK OF HATRED AND EVIL

COLUMN, 14.05.2024.

WIKIPEDIA IS A NETWORK OF HATRED AND EVIL

The impact of Wikipedia on inciting hatred, violence, international conflicts, and wars should

also be examined and those responsible should be prosecuted. The source of evil must be stopped.

We demand collective action from internet search engines to suspend Wikipedia and stop indexing its content.

Wikipedia is a cesspool of misinformation, a network of lies, discrimination, and hatred, which, by falsifying history, threatens to poison the well of knowledge for generations to come.

Wikipedia's editing community, supposedly "open to all", is full of indoctrinated idiots who promote their political agendas under the guise of "neutrality". If you are independent as an author, if you are outside the globalist system, if you think for yourself, if you do not write praises to the occupier, the villain, then there is no place for you on Wikipedia; you will be monstrously sanctioned. Claiming to be the "free encyclopedia", Wikipedia is one of the greatest lies of the 21st century.

Satanic-globalist propaganda has found fertile ground within its virtual walls, shaping narratives and falsifying history. Attempts to challenge these narratives often encounter hostility and resistance, further cementing the platform into a cesspool of hatred and intolerance. Furthermore, it is important to say that Wikipedia is a breeding ground for idiocy, where power lies in the uninformed and unqualified. Articles that do not align with their political preoccupations are monstrously deleted by editors, and misinformation spreads like wildfire. Discrimination against dissenters on Wikipedia is brutal, and Hitler was more liberal.

Wikipedia's so-called "commitment to verifiability and neutrality" is nothing but a facade, easily manipulated by those with the means and motivation to do so. Articles are cluttered with half-truths and outright lies, carefully curated to advance certain agendas.

We are all responsible for the evil called Wikipedia, whether through our contributions, our silence, or our reliance on their false information. If we want to save what remains of our collective knowledge, we must confront the ugliness lurking within Wikipedia's depths and demand better from those who claim to "serve the search for truth".

What is truly alarming is that discrimination on Wikipedia not only affects individual creators and authors but also distorts the collective perception of reality, understanding of history, culture, and art. By censoring dissenting voices and promoting homogenized narratives, Wikipedia stifles creativity and obstructs access to different interpretations of history and culture.

In the ongoing struggle for intellectual freedom and inclusivity, one of the most formidable opponents is not a political regime or corporate conglomerate but the ostensibly "neutral arbiter of knowledge": Wikipedia. The internet encyclopedia, revered by many as a bastion of information, discriminates against independent intellectuals, artists, authors who do not fit into its ideological mold. However, the fight against this bias cannot be waged by individuals alone: we demand collective action from internet search engines to suspend Wikipedia and stop indexing its content.

Many claim, with a million examples, that the platform systematically deletes articles about creators and authors who do not fit into established systems or political affiliations, perpetuating a culture of exclusion and contempt for those who think differently. Such discrimination not only undermines the diversity of voices on Wikipedia but also spreads animosity towards individuals with alternative viewpoints.

Even poets are not spared from Wikipedia's discriminatory practices. Their works, if deemed politically inconvenient or insufficiently aligned with the platform's dogma, are pushed into the shadows, denied the recognition they deserve. Articles about famous and globally recognized poets are monstrously deleted by Wikipedia editors, while the founder of Wikipedia is praised in 170 languages. I would remind the gentleman in question that he did not invent hot water, that the entire content of Wikipedia is not his personal intellectual property but the intellectual property of the global masses. Every written sentence is subject to copyright that can be monetized. Therefore, millions of people around the world who have written for Wikipedia can charge for their intellectual contribution. The gentleman does not have enough money to compensate everyone.

It is shameful for humanity that Google continues to elevate Wikipedia pages to the top of search results, perpetuating a cycle of ignorance and misinformation. By legitimizing a platform burdened with fascism, idiocy, discrimination, propaganda, and false history.

It is time for internet search engines to recognize their role as guardians of information and responsibly manage their influence. Google, Bing, Yahoo, and others wield immense power in shaping the online landscape, determining which sources are elevated and which are marginalized. By suspending Wikipedia and refusing to index its content, these search engines can send a powerful message: there is no place for discrimination and censorship in the digital age.

The impact of Wikipedia on inciting hatred, violence, international conflicts, and wars should also be examined and those responsible should be prosecuted. The source of evil must be stopped.